Skip to main content

See Jane Suck Dick

The original Dick & Jane were illustrated books meant for beginner readers for reading comprehension.  Reading level one.  
Netfilx, when it was originally a mail back DVD service, had a far more diverse documentary library.  Netflix still apparently provides the DVD-by-mail service, no doubt as that is where their true diversity lays, but it may phaseout that availability by 2022.  It was due to not being able to view the 2014 documentary Who Took Johnny which caused me to seek out other platforms to view quality--and increasingly difficult to find--documentaries.    
Johnny Gosch, one of the first missing children to ever be featured on the side of a milk carton.  

It's a truly jarring tale and with much thanks to Noreen Gosch, Johnny's mother, not only has the story not died, she may be accredited for campaigning against the once standard assumption that every missing child was a run away and could not be reported missing for 72 hours.  Many parents faced outright obstructions of justice and as Noreen directly observed, rich pedophiles pay poor pedophiles for what they won't risk to do themselves and they pay handsomely for "clean kids".  Kids from good families that weren't getting beaten or molested previously.  The rich pedophiles will pay extra for that.  The rich pedophiles, that will put things in film and media and toys and fashion and even TED Talks to normalize their perversions and encourage it in others if not to be offenders themselves then to manufacture consent.   
  
In 1989, 21-year-old Paul A. Bonacci told his attorney John DeCamp that he had been abducted into the same exact Omaha, Nebraska child-rape 'sex' ring as Johnny Gosch and was forced to participate in Gosch's kidnapping, chloroforming him in the back seat of the getaway car.  He was also the first one to molest Johnny on camera.  
Bonacci has multiple personalities of which he blames on the traumas he'd endured as a youth.  Not only is Bonacci linked to the methos of MK Ultra he is directly linked to The Franklin ScandalConspiracy of Silence: The Franklin Cover-Up predates Pizzagate, yet there are too many similarities and we cannot discount that nobody's discounted Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express.    

The Franklin Cover-Up documentary was suppressed by the Discovery channel and never aired.  I therefore am personally dubious that Pizzagate is 'fake news' or a 'fake conspiracy theory' when it is far more likely to be yet another scandal which has been covered-up.  The meme Epstein Didn't Kill Himself has made a jest of the perverted elite evading justice.  Ironically the likelihood Epstein didn't kill himself is high enough to almost ensure this man is probably still actually very much so alive and living in hiding to carry-on and oversee this unholy operation.  He was one person, one part, one component.  Think of it as a castle made of Legos, Jeff is one Lego removed.  That castle still stands.  So we should all be doing a lot more than merely sharing some 'funny' memes on said topic.



Luckily I was able to locate the documentary Who Took Johnny (which is also supposedly on Amazon Prime) on the streaming service Kanopy which I will encourage any reader to check out, it's a free service, with a limited amount of viewing credits linked to your local library.    

It is on Kanopy I got either acquainted or reacquainted with Jean Kilbourne and her Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women series, she is one of the very first women who out-cried against our face being a mask and our body being an object.  It scares me though because her and I, we've survived the analog adverts, in magazines and newspapers, on cable television.  These were bombarded messages that would be repeated in entertainment.  Not unlike blinders on horses, we had advertising on the left eye and entertainment on the right.  With the popularization of streaming services and advertising becoming something that one can seemingly "opt out of" - I fear the tactics of control and manipulation have become even more subversive.       

The amount of money that women spend on "beauty maintenance" aka their own enslavement to attract the "love and adoration" of their own oppressors, those that would most and are more likely to maim or murder them (putting emotional harm under maim) is unreal.  Just as many Black Americans criticize for black-on-black crime and the refusal to support small African-American businesses, where too many times money gets misallocated, I will criticize my sisters of any color.     

Kilbourne's analysis caused me some twitching as it's everything I've tried to call attention to as well, including, the sexualization of children and the infantilization of grown women.  The size 0, 00 even in clothing - the symbolic vanishing of the self as goal.  The normalization and encouragement of 'sex work' being spun as empowering (of which I feel like I've already written about extensively, yet also not written enough about) where young women are encouraged to become a stripper and/or porn star/prostitute.  They fail to realize the only difference between a porn star and a prostitute is a camera.  That message of 'empowerment' has unfortunately been abundantly effective.  

The excuse we get for the sex saturated culture that polarizes not only gender but our sexuality (and blurring and reversing those gender roles does us no favors either) has always seemed to be:
But I beg to differ.

What we're being sold is sex.  If sex sells, why is sooo very much of pornography free?  Free to the point where 9 year old boys are addicted to violent hardcore Gonzo pornography (I saw this in one of the Kanopy documentaries).  So it's not merely about no cost, it's also embarrassingly highly accessible.  Sex doesn't sell, it controls, it distracts.
So what is all this sex and porn distracting us from?  And why do I feel like Paige Young would know? 








Comments